Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Isabella Kruger vs Noa Liauw A Fong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kruger vs Fong analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Isabella Kruger vs Noa Liauw A Fong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kruger 1 - 0 Fong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kruger has won 42.8% of points on their second serve, while Fong has won 38.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kruger, in recent form, has won 56.09% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fong has won 56.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.98% and 41.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kruger has saved 61.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fong has saved 45.45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kruger has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 9/ 5), with Fong winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kruger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 55/ 37). Fong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Kruger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4), where as Fong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 6/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kruger winning 1 times and Fong being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kruger winning 2 and Fong winning 1. The last match between Kruger and Fong was at the W15 Cairo, 28-04-2021, First, Clay with Isabella Kruger getting the victory 3-6 6-0 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kruger and Fong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kruger winning 1 times and Fong 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kruger winning 0, and Fong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kruger has played against opponents with an average rank of 112.57 while Fong has played against players with an average rank of 61.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kruger has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fong has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kruger has converted 58.11% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fong has converted 49.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
887
Rank
330
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
856
Rank
577
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
62% (81-50)
Career Total W/L
49% (90-95)
67% (6-3)
YTD W/L
50% (8-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Isabella Kruger vs Noa Liauw A Fong For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kruger VS Fong
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Isabella Kruger | Noa Liauw A Fong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 8 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:35:0 | 2:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (46/72) | 72% (63/88) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (26/46) | 49% (31/63) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (12/26) | 44% (11/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (8/18) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (46/88) | 47% (34/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-0 6-4 |
Stats 
Isabella Kruger
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
0
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Isabella Kruger | Noa Liauw A Fong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (6/3) | 50% (8/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (13/9) | 48% (16/17) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (100/84) | 49% (148/153) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (6/3) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.65 | 0.46 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:26 | 1:16:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.56 | 76.63 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (362/598) | 67% (475/711) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (229/362) | 54% (258/475) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (101/236) | 39% (92/236) |
| BPs Won% Total | 58% (43/74) | 49% (45/91) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (299/613) | 47% (314/666) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (5/8) | 50% (8/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 11% (9/1) |
Isabella Kruger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Haine Ogata
68%
(
75 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
52 of
90)
112
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Koronayashe Rugara
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jahnie Van Zyl
Player
Isabella Kruger
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Isabella Kruger
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Maddalena Giordano
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Isabella Kruger
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
42%
(
38 of
90)
4
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Indy De Vroome
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
18 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
44
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Isabella Kruger
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Noa Liauw A Fong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Jamshidi
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Smriti Bhasin
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
8
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Linge Steenkamp
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Talita Swart
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacqueline Cabaj Awad
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Noa Liauw A Fong
Player
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
47%
(
24 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carolann Delaunay
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ayline Esina Samardzic
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
61%
(
68 of
111)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
56 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
47 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katarina Kuzmova
Player
Noa Liauw A Fong
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kruger Vs Fong Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kruger are available here and Fong photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Isabella Kruger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
